Ravenclaw Colors Book Vs Movie Essay

That damn Harry Potter has done it again.

The Boy Who Lived has once again made the internet livid by simply celebrating the 20th anniversary of his introduction to the world in Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone. But among the event’s celebrations and dedications, it was wholly unsurprising that the anniversary dredged up a perpetually argumentative concept that has ruined many a friendship: Hogwarts houses.

Nobody who has reached consciousness in post-’90s pop culture has been able to avoid that pressing question we’ve all heard: “What house are you in?” The respondent’s answer somehow always manages to surprise the interviewer, yet the cycle goes round and round, with things like Pottermore only living to make the question infinitely more burdensome. However, as the years have passed and J.K. Rowling has expanded the wizarding world through further writing and her tweeting purview, the four houses of Hogwarts have morphed into something far more loaded than their initial introductions in the Sorting Hat’s song of September. For better or worse, the words Gryffindor, Slytherin, Hufflepuff, and Ravenclaw have become a combination of stereotype, hyperbole, and brutal peer-to-peer judgment — and their names alone are, in a word, triggering.

Such a phenomenon reared its head on the eve of #HarryPotter20, as allegiances were declared and battle lines were tweeted. And so, here at EW, a portion of us fairly devoted Harry Potter fans have decided to clear up the murkiest of misconceptions that have come to plague the houses with which we so closely identify.


There is only one pertinent word worth using when describing a Slytherin: ambitious. Yes, Voldemort was a Slytherin. Yes, so was almost every other evil character. Yes, the parallel between Nazis and Death Eaters is problematic. But is it reasonable to argue that everyone in Slytherin is inherently evil? Absolutely not. (If anything, that’s the whole reason Cursed Child exists — to shame you for thinking such a thing.) And yet, pop culture has written off Slytherin as a savage breed of loathsome people when, in actuality, ambition itself is not a desire worth damning — especially in an age when a millennial’s wish to afford basic rent is considered wildly aspirational.

Do you think there weren’t Slytherins hiding in the bathroom during Voldemort’s shenanigans because they didn’t want to jeopardize a Quidditch scholarship? Can’t a Slytherin share a house with the most famous dark wizard of all time and win best-dressed at the Yule Ball? I urge people to think of Slytherin less as a reflection of personality and more as a marker of purpose, fully realized. I think Slytherin when I think of rich heiresses of Beverly Hills, and savvy con artists, and eager med-school students and hard-ass football coaches and hungry Newsies understudies and slick car salesmen. They all share a laser-eyed focus on the fundamental absence in their lives. (And calling their achievement methods “cunning” is simply just a more colorful way of saying “imaginative.”)

Personality-wise, there are indeed links among Slytherin dispositions, but they’re more to do with the amalgamation of traits a Slytherin assembles to present him or herself to the world. No Hogwarts house takes better advantage of the dichotomy between outward presentation and inward truth than the serpent. Rude Slytherins have been doing it wrong the whole time. When someone insists that you, a Slytherin, are “more of a Hufflepuff,” that’s just part of the con, babe. Slytherins don’t get to the top by just wanting to be there! They adapt a little something from every other house to do it. They put in all the work of the Ravenclaw, they make all the bold moves of the Gryffindor, they smile and shake hands and scoot along submissively like the Hufflepuff. (And this, by the way, says nothing of the supposed idea that a Huffle’s principal value is loyalty, which is not an exclusive trait to any one house and, if you really want to spill that pumpkin tea, is demonstrated most consistently in the Harry Potter series by the Slytherins anyway).

So here lie we, the Slytherins, entering your consciousness with this outrageous burden of badness, but using those prejudices to get what we need and where we need by charming the game and performing the play. There’s authenticity in the craft of it all. Your mistake is not in befriending a Slytherin, but in writing one off as exactly what you already think we are.

And by the way: Anyone who self-identifies as a Gryffindor is actually a Hufflepuff. Ravenclaws are too afraid to really get to know themselves (spoiler alert: we ALL read). And I think I made my stance fairly clear on Hufflepuffs. – MARC SNETIKER


How many people have you met who say they’re a Gryffindor, but they’re… probably not? I don’t know if it’s the color scheme, the fact that we’d all like to think we’re brave enough to stand up when we see injustice in the world, or maybe it’s just simply that J.K. Rowling’s main protagonists in the Potter novels call this house home. But wanting to be Hermione Granger or be best pals with the Weasley twins doesn’t mean you’d be sorted into their house.

That said, not all Gryffindors are like Harry, Ron, and Hermione. While those three are arguably the most famous members of the house since Godric himself, they’re also some of the most reckless (sneaking around at all hours, going into the Forbidden Forest, spontaneous road trip to the Ministry based on Harry’s mystery dreams, you see where I’m going with this). And while, by definition, members of Gryffindor house are “brave at heart,” that doesn’t mean everyone jumps into perilous situations at every plot twist and turn. There are other ways to possess “daring, nerve, and chivalry,” like loyalty to one’s friends and quieter (but still profound) ways of resisting the forces of evil and standing up for what’s right.

There’s also an affinity for adventure that I think comes along with being on Team Gryffindor that for Harry/Ron/Hermione certainly manifested itself in courting danger, but isn’t always necessarily that extreme. Also, we don’t all love cats — come on, our symbol is a lion! — but it doesn’t hurt if you do (or maybe that’s just me…).

While we’re on the subject: I really do think Slytherins get a bad rap — there’s nothing wrong with being ambitious unless your ambition is to ruin everyone’s lives. For Ravenclaws, being smart doesn’t have to (and shouldn’t) be the most interesting thing about you. And, Hufflepuffs … never change, guys. – JESSICA DERSCHOWITZ


Having Fantastic Beasts and Where To Find Them protagonist Newt Scamander be a member of Hufflepuff felt like a clear concession by J.K. Rowling to make up for how underserved Hufflepuff was by the original Harry Potter series. Hardly any characters actually belong to Hufflepuff in those early books. For the most part, the good guys are Gryffindor, the bad guys are Slytherin, and the smart girls are Ravenclaw. Where does that leave Hufflepuff? Nowhere, really. There was Cedric Diggory, of course, but he was a clear exception who stood in the Triwizard Tournament as a representative of Hogwarts itself, rather than Hufflepuff. The result, as a highly popular Second City video showed in 2011, is that the average person can’t think of a single characteristic to describe Hufflepuff.

Well, Hufflepuffs are definitely more than nothing, but what are we exactly? One reason Hufflepuff might seem less well-defined than the other three houses is that we are far less exclusionary. We don’t care how many books you’ve read or how many famous wizards are in your family tree; if you’re ready to work hard and try your best, we’re happy to have you. This tradition dates back to Helga Hufflepuff, who famously declared to her fellow Hogwarts founders that “I’ll teach the lot, and treat them just the same.”

So while Hufflepuffs possess fewer surface-level similarities, we all understand the value of hard work and the importance of loyalty to your fellow people. What often gets overlooked are the rewards of that kind of work. When Hufflepuffs put hard work into exploring their own eccentric interests, they can reap rare rewards – developing difficult plants like Professor Sprout or track down impossible-to-find creatures like Newt. Hufflepuff’s inclusivity does not lead to blandness, as many assume; by contrast, it allows for the discovery and cultivation of all kinds of unique treasures.

Philosophies: Gryffindors act like they’re sticking up for the little guy, but really they just want to put themselves front and center. Slytherins gain their power and prestige from excluding others and are therefore not to be trusted. Ravenclaws need to get their head out of a book once in a while and talk to people. — CHRISTIAN HOLUB


Ravenclaw is a lot of people’s backup House; they fancy the romance of Gryffindor or the dangerous glamour of Slytherin or… I guess that’s it. But most people wouldn’t say no to Ravenclaw, because there’s really not a lot that actually offends people about it. Ravenclaws are smart? Everybody thinks they’re smart. Most people, however, consider intellect a secondary element of their identity; it isn’t quite as impactful a brand (if wizards were to concern themselves with such low Muggle concepts as brands) as courage or loyalty or ambition, all of which have actual Shakespearean soliloquys devoted to them and are outwardly demonstrable, whereas an act of intelligence is, what, reading?

I have to say, I resent the popular image of Ravenclaw as a collective of introverts who spend all their time with their noses in books. Luna Lovegood, unquestionably the most visible member of the House, is a textbook Ravenclaw in that, yes, she is cerebral and perceptive, but more importantly in that she is textbook in no other respect. Singularity is typical (ironic though that may be) of Ravenclaws, because the fruits of the labors of the mind are inspiration, creativity — which make for very distinctive individuals. Furthermore, anyone whose primary interest is expanding their knowledge will be curious and highly engaged with the world around them, rather than shut off from it. What better way to learn than to seek out other people’s perspectives?

The main misconception, if you can call it that, about Ravenclaw is that they’re all just intelligent. I mean, sure, yes, okay, thank you, we are — but not only. Very intelligent people sometimes belong in other houses (see: Hermione), because as Harry Potter himself is living proof, Sorting has just as much, if not more, to do with one’s values as it does with one’s aptitudes. Belonging to Ravenclaw doesn’t signify that you have a great mind (though you probably do) as much as it does that you want to use it — and that is a profound thing. That is a strong characteristic (worthy of Shakespeare, certainly), and one that can take as many outward forms as there are flavors of Bertie Bott’s Beans. Because when the trait we define ourselves by — and perhaps, to be honest, are overly concerned with — is what’s going on inside our heads, that can manifest itself as just about anything outside of them.

And just so you know: The best and truest Gryffindors are the (very) few who do not suffer from delusions of grandeur, but rather suffer from the sad suspicion that they don’t actually belong in Gryffindor. Slytherins are never as smart as they think they are. And Hufflepuffs just break my heart a little. – MARY SOLLOSI

Peter Mountain/Warner Bros.; Everett Collection; Warner Bros.


House colours

Blue and bronze[1]


  • Intelligence
  • Wit
  • Wisdom
  • Creativity
  • Originality
  • Individuality
  • Acceptance[3]
"Or yet in wise old Ravenclaw,
If you've a ready mind,
Where those of wit and learning,
Will always find their kind.
—The Sorting Hat[src]

Ravenclaw is one of the four Houses of Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry, founded by Rowena Ravenclaw. Members of this house are characterised by their wit, learning, and wisdom. Its house colours are blue and bronze, and its symbol is an eagle.[4] The house ghost, who in life was the daughter of the house's founder Rowena Ravenclaw, is the Grey Lady[5]. Ravenclaw corresponds roughly to the element of air[6]; the House colours blue and bronze were chosen to represent the sky and eagle feathers respectively, both having much to do with air[7].


"Wit beyond measure is man's greatest treasure."
—Rowena Ravenclaw[src]

Ravenclaw House prizes learning, wisdom, wit, and intellect in its members.[4] Thus, many Ravenclaws tend to be academically motivated and talented students. They also pride themselves in being original in their ideas, and methods. It's not unusual to find Ravenclaw students practising especially different types of magic that other houses might shun. Hermione Granger, an extremely intelligent witch and the top student in her year, was sorted into Gryffindor, though she admitted that the Sorting Hat had seriously considered placing her in Ravenclaw.[8]

Often hard-working and diligent, as often is the case with intellectuals with a predisposition for academics, some of the pupils sorted under the blue-bronzed eagle are known to be inclined to dismiss certain social expectation for the sake of satisfying their own intellectual curiosity. Some of these eventually also ended up being not only accepted, but even celebrated, in spite of being initially subjected to scorn for their various oddities. Luna Lovegood, for example, was one such student: Eccentric to put it at its mildest, she was a Ravenclaw student who initially was bullied for her open defiance of conventionality, but ultimately became a celebrated wizarding naturalists and renowned for her participation inthe legendary Battle of Hogwarts and past membership in Dumbledore's Army. Another example would be Professor Filius Flitwick, a half-goblin who might have faced scorn for his short stature earlier in life but went on to become a renowned Duelling Champion, and subsequently one of the finest and most knowledgable Charms Masters in the entirety of the wizarding world during his employment at Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry. (The best, according to some of his students).

Ravenclaws tend to be curious about the world and pay attention to the world around them. Ravenclaws are known to be logical and rational.

Even so, not all Ravenclaws were motivated by academical prowess. Examples on such individuals includes Gilderoy Lockhart and Cho Chang, both of whom sought to use the good name and renown of their house, the inherent expectations of certain academic prowess that comes with being sorted into it said as well as the often somewhat natural ability of its members to gain popularity among their peers, which particularly was the case of the former, proving true the fact that a good student not necessarily made a good witch or wizard.


"I got into big trouble during my third year for duelling a Ravenclaw prefect who insisted that Bridget Wenlock had come from his house, not mine."
—A Hufflepuff with an intelligent witch in their house[src]

According to SlytherinprefectGemma Farley, Ravenclaws are so competitive when it comes to academic success that they are known to back stab each other, and likely other students, in order to get top marks. While Hufflepuff prefect Gabriel Truman noted that they are so proud of the success of famous members, such as Laverne de Montmorency, that they claim any intelligent wizard as a member of Ravenclaw House, such as Bridget Wenlock, who was, in fact a Hufflepuff. Some Ravenclaws, such as Uric the Oddball, are also noted to have a propensity towards eccentricity.

Ravenclaw House appears to have little rivalry with the other houses, except in Quidditch. Harry Potter believed that they tended to side with Gryffindor in its rivalry with Slytherin, as did Hufflepuff house. However, during the 1994Triwizard Tournament, most Ravenclaws supported Hufflepuff Champion Cedric Diggory over Harry.[9] They believed that Harry had in fact cheated his way into being a champion and that the true Hogwarts champion was Cedric. Many Ravenclaws (such as Cho Chang) joined Dumbledore's Army and fought in the Battle of Hogwarts along with Gryffindors and Hufflepuffs. They rouse at almost at the exact moment as the Hufflepuffs and turned their wands upon Pansy Parkinson and Slytherin House in Harry Potter's defence, when the former wished to hand Harry over to Lord Voldemort and his army of Death Eaters.

Within the house, though, they’re well-known for being welcoming and encouraging of creativity, eccentricity and individuality and being very accepting.

Common Room

Knocker: "Which came first, the phoenix or the flame?"
Luna Lovegood: "I think the answer is that a circle has no beginning."
Knocker: "Well reasoned."
— Luna solving a riddle to enter Ravenclaw tower[src]

The Ravenclaw common room is in one of the castle's towers and is wide and circular. You have to climb a tight spiral staircase to get there. It has graceful arched windows, and the walls are hung with blue and bronze silks. The domed ceiling is painted with stars, which are echoed in the midnight-blue carpet. Tables, chairs, and bookcases cover the expanse of the floor, and a white-marble statue of Rowena Ravenclaw sits next to the door that leads to the dormitories above. Harry Potter entered the common room in 1998 while searching for clues to the location of one of Voldemort's Horcruxes.

Unlike the other common rooms in the school, a logical riddle given by a bronze eagle-shaped knocker must be answered to enter.[5] This could prove troublesome as anyone with enough intellect could intrude into the dormitory, as is shown in 1998 where Professor McGonagall had no trouble entering by answering the riddle correctly (though she was a "hatstall" between Gryffindor and Ravenclaw). However, Hermione stated in her first year when figuring out the complicated riddle, beneath the trapdoor, that most wizards and witches do not have much sense of logic, which might be something that Ravenclaw noticed herself and decided to use clever riddles instead of passwords, as they are safer than some words.

Head of House

The head of house before and during Harry Potter's time was Filius Flitwick. It is unknown when he became head of house, but it is known that he was teaching Charms in 1971. It is unknown whom he succeeded.

Known Ravenclaws


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *